Now Reading
German Flag Carrier Lufthansa is Banning Apple’s Popular AirTag For Luggage Tracking With Bizarre Policy

German Flag Carrier Lufthansa is Banning Apple’s Popular AirTag For Luggage Tracking With Bizarre Policy

German flag carrier Lufthansa is reportedly technically banning passengers from using Apple’s popular AirTag gadget in their checked luggage because the airline fears the tracking device poses an in-flight danger unless they are turned off and essentially rendered useless.

Launched in April 2021 as a way for Apple users to keep track of commonly misplaced everyday objects like keys and wallets, the AirTag made a pretty quiet debut until this year when the gadget’s popularity soared.

Apple

As demand for air travel surged back earlier this year, many airlines quickly buckled under the pressure. Airlines didn’t have nearly enough staff and workers who had been let go during the pandemic didn’t want to go back to low-paid shift work hauling bags at an airport.

The result was months of travel chaos and hundreds of thousands of lost and delayed baggage that piled up in airports around the world.

Passengers lodged lost baggage claims but went ignored by airlines that were inundated with baggage enquiries. If only there were a way for passengers to keep track of their bags after they placed them on the baggage conveyor and into the care of the airlines.

The AirTag was the obvious answer. Cheap, light and small, the AirTag works by transmitting a unique identifier via an inbuilt Bluetooth signal. The signal is picked up by any nearby Apple phone which sends location information to Apple.

Apple

The owner of the AirTag can then trace the last known location of the gadget via their ‘Find My’ app on their own phone. AirTag’s don’t have their own GPS or phone signal, and they can’t be remotely switched on and off.

In April, Elliot Sharod who goes by the name Avios Adventurer on Twitter made headlines around the world as he used his AirTag’s to track one of his bags that had been lost by Aer Lingus.

The airline promised to deliver his bag via courier, but out of four bags that had gone missing, the courier only turned up with three. Elliot had to play detective for Aer Lingus and track the last missing bag to an address in London.

And in another case in August in Florida, a luggage thief was caught after a bag with more than $15,000 worth of jewellery didn’t show up on the carousel after a flight. The AirTag attached to the bag led police straight to the thief’s home.

But despite their obvious uses, a Lufthansa spokesperson says AirTag’s should be switched off because they are considered as ‘dangerous goods’.

“Luggage trackers belong to the category of portable electronic devices and are therefore subject to the dangerous goods regulations issued by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) for transport in aircraft,” a spokesperson for Lufthansa told German publication Wirtschaftswoche last month.

“Accordingly, due to their transmission function, the trackers must be deactivated during the flight, similar to mobile phones, laptops, tablets, etc. if they are in checked baggage.”

Of course, a luggage tracker is only any good as a luggage tracker when it is switched on.

So where does this leave passengers? Well, in a bizarre twist, Lufthansa says it won’t officially ban AirTag’s even though it points to rules that say they are technically not allowed. What is interesting is that Apple markets the AirTag as a luggage-tracking device, so it seems odd that the airline industry is still unsure about its use.


This article has been updated with information provided by Lufthansa which confirms the airline is not officially banning AirTag’s. The wording has also been altered to reflect a technical ban rather than written ban, which is implied by Lufthansa’s statement on the use of luggage trackers.

View Comments (6)
  • I can not functionally understand how they would enforce this. It’s a Bluetooth device running in 2.4 GHz similar to Tile, are they going to start searching luggage for AirTags and Tile devices? I think if anything they are trying to save themselves the embarrassment of have a customer find a lost bag more effectively and efficiently than their own systems can.

  • Blah blah blah. Totally unenforceable without manually going thru EVERY single bag. And AirTags do not have on/off options. This is purely to cover their lazy ass handling of checked luggage.

    • Not unenforceable, only difficult to enforce. They would need to scan every piece of luggage for a Bluetooth transmitter. Any transmitters found would be deactivated or removed. Pain in the back side, which is why they haven’t been enforcing. Air tags do have an on/off function, remove the battery or destroy the device. Anything that that uses a battery or electricity has an on/off capability of some sort; remove the batteries, unplug it, destroy the device. Might not be able to turn it back on but you can definitely turn it off.

  • LH what a joke. Instead of better the services they try to remove the trackers. Well, Apple will introduce a function for user to program the AirTag to be swithed off and on at certain time. That would comply with IATA DGR as the device would be off during flight and automatically get online after programmed arrival time.

    Good Luck Lufthansa.

  • The headline says Lufthansa is banning them, but there is no confirmation of the ban or any info about when it might ever come. Right now, it just sounds like someone was spouting off to the media. No information on a ban or confirmation of one has been furnished.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2023 paddleyourownkanoo.com All Rights Reserved.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to paddleyourownkanoo.com with appropriate and specific directions to the original content.