Now Reading
Qantas Pilot Sues Airline for Post Traumatic Stress After Plane Lost Engine

Qantas Pilot Sues Airline for Post Traumatic Stress After Plane Lost Engine

A former pilot is suing Australian flag-carrier Qantas claiming she suffered post-traumatic stress disorder following a mid-air emergency when the plane she was flying lost one of its two engines. Jacinda Cottee is seeking A$780,000 (USD $630,000) in damages for the accident which she says was caused by poor maintenance by the aircraft operator.

Cottee worked as a First Officer for Cobham Aviation Services which provided Boeing 717 services for Qantas Link until the operation was brought in-house last year. She was working on Qantas flight QF1799 from Alice Springs to Brisbane in March 2018 when one of the engines failed more than 500km from its destination.

The pilots declared an emergency and the passengers were told to brace and prepared for a potential evacuation. Thankfully, the flight landed without further incident and no injuries were reported amongst the passengers or crew.

An engineering inspection later determined that there was damage to the compressor blades and the engine had to be replaced. Qantas, however, says that a review by engine manufacturer Rolls Royce found that the problem was the result of a manufacturing issue and not a maintenance problem.

“All Qantas aircraft are maintained to the highest safety standards, and our fleet of Boeing 717 aircraft have a 99.99 per cent reliability rate. This is the only engine shut down on QantasLink’s B717 fleet over a five-year period,” a spokesperson for Qantas said of the incident.

“Like all pilots, the first officer had been trained on how to respond in the event of an engine power failure,” the statement continued.

Cottee’s lawyers claim QantasLink breached its duty of care by failing to carry out adequate maintenance or inspections on the engines. She is claiming compensation for lost earnings.

Backing up her claim, Cottee argues that Boeing 717 maintenance was moved from Australia to Singapore due to poor workmanship in the airline’s Canberra facility.

Cottee says the case should highlight the need for airlines to offer adequate mental health support to crew following emergency incidents.

View Comments (3)
  • With this logic I will also sue my employer because since pandemic started i have less flying hours than I used to have before.

  • While I am sympathetic and respectful of the trauma she (and everyone else on board that flight incurred), I find it a bit out of the norm as she is a trained pilot. Her entire professional training and career is focused on events like this. It should be expected she can do her duties and not turn around and sue the company.

    It wasn’t like malicious intent here.

  • A millenial who believes that she is entitled to go through life without any sort of unpleasantness. I wonder if she complained about her simulator instructors when they rudely induced systems failures during her periodic training?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

BoardingArea