Now Reading
United Airlines Becomes Latest Corporation to Speak Out Against Voter Supression Laws

United Airlines Becomes Latest Corporation to Speak Out Against Voter Supression Laws

a white airplane on a runway

United Airlines has become the latest corporation to weigh in on the debate surrounding new voter laws that are moving through the legislative process in a number of states. Critics claim the laws are simply a backlash to record voter turnout in the 2020 Presidential Election, risk restricting access to the polls for legitimate voters and could be discriminatory.

United’s rival Delta Air Lines faced threats of a boycott after apparently supporting one such bill that has now been signed into law in its home state of Georgia. Delta chief executive Ed Bastian led a bungled response to the new law and suggested that the Atlanta-based airline had helped to craft key provisions in the bill.

Bastian initially refused to apologize for apparently helping Senate Bill 7 get passed into law but insisted Delta’s involvement in lobbying lawmakers had helped remove the most “egregious” parts of the bill. Only after days of mounting criticism did Bastian finally denounce the bill.

American Airlines was quick to speak out against a similar bill moving through the legislature in its home state of Texas, saying it was “strongly opposed” to the law – as well as other similar bills in other states. Texas lieutenant governor Dan Patrick hit back saying AA had criticized the bill before even reading it.

While there aren’t any controversial new voter laws currently under discussion in its home state of Illinois, United Airlines nonetheless decided to join the fray on Monday and speak out against them.

“Some have questioned the integrity of the nation’s election systems and are using it to justify stricter voting procedures, even though numerous studies have found zero credible evidence of widespread fraud in U.S. elections,” the airline said.

“Legislation that infringes on the right to vote of fellow Americans is wrong,” the statement continued. “We believe that leaders in both parties should work to protect the rights of eligible voters by making it easier and more convenient for them to cast a ballot and have it counted.”

According to the Brennan Center for Justice, the most restrictive bills take aim at absentee voting, while nearly a quarter seek stricter voter ID requirements. “State lawmakers also aim to make voter registration harder, expand voter roll purges or adopt flawed practices that would risk improper purges, and cut back on early voting,” the center explained.

A spokesperson for United Airlines said on Monday: “Our mission is to connect people and unite the world. We believe that one of the most effective ways to do this is to engage in the democratic process, which begins with voting – a vital civic duty. America’s democracy is stronger when we’re all engaged, and every vote is properly counted.”

Photo Credit: Mehdi Photos /

View Comments (6)
  • Amen to that, the next I board a flight and they ask for my ID I’ll say nope that racist. See how well that goes, the corporate idiots simply do get it!

  • The only thing these bills suppress are fraudulent votes. We need an ID to get a library card, to enter a college campus, to buy beer, to deposit a check, and to fly. I think preventing fraudulent mail in ballots and dead people voting is worth showing an ID. I hope politicians stand up for us. We shouldn’t be bullied by the black Dem lobby that uses race as an excuse to commit fraud.

  • Not FlyingUnited ever again …. you are caving to a lefts wing N lie ! Voter ID is NOT Voter suppression ….. you need an ID to do about anything in this world and you need to support the appropriate ID to travel and vote!!!!!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to with appropriate and specific directions to the original content.