Flight attendants have expressed frustration that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not first consult them over its recent and unexpected decision to end the ‘shoes off’ policy at TSA security checkpoints at airports across the United States.
DHS Secretary Kristi Noem officially announced the new policy on July 8, although it had already been leaked and widely shared before federal officials confirmed the decision to “increase hospitality” for travelers.
The Association of Flight Attendants (AFA-CWA), the largest crew member union in the US, representing tens of thousands of flight attendants, was, however, caught off-guard by the updated security guidance and has made it known that it wanted to be involved in the decision-making process.
In an internal memo, the union, which counts crew members at Alaska, Spirit, and United Airlines amongst their members, said it was “deeply concerned” that the policy update “was made without consulting our union or any other frontline labor organizations.”
“We are actively addressing this oversight with the TSA and DHS and coordinating with our union partners to ensure we are included in future policy changes that impact safety, operations, and our fellow flight attendants,” the memo continued.
Publicly, the union hasn’t gone so far as to criticize the DHS, but in a statement, AFA said that Noem’s statement that “every [security] rule is being evaluated” but put it on a heightened state of vigilance.
Referring to the terrible events of 9/11, an event that was the catalyst for the creation of the TSA, the union said: “Our union made a promise 24 years ago to Never Forget and we carry that promise in the work we do every day as aviation’s first responders and last line of defense.”
Noem made the decision to end the ‘shoes off’ policy, “drastically decrease passenger wait times at our TSA checkpoints,” which, in turn, she hopes will lead to a more pleasant and efficient passenger experience.”
It was, however, only in April that a TSA spokesperson shared a photo of a utility blade that had been found concealed in a pair of flip flops that a traveler tried to smuggle through a security checkpoint at Washington Dulles Airport.
In a post on X from an official TSA account, the agency said: “This is a good example of why TSA requires travelers to remove their footwear to be screened via X-ray.”
The latest thinking from the DHS, however, is that new full-body scanners using Advanced Imaging Technology, which are deployed at most airports, are capable of detecting potential threats in footwear that would lead to additional screening.
What Is The New Policy?
Officially announced on July 8 and now rolled out at domestic airports across the United States, all travelers (regardless of TSA PreCheck status) are no longer required to remove their footwear at TSA checkpoints so that they can be scanned in an X-ray machine.
Full body scanners should detect anything suspicious in a passenger’s footwear, and TSA agents will then conduct additional screening on any shoes that trigger an alert.
In addition, the TSA still has the power to conduct random shoe screenings, and the DHS says airports will have the power to resume the shoes-off policy based on specific intelligence or simply at the direction of the on-duty security director.
Why Did Kristi Noem Make This Decision Now?
In the official statement announcing the change, DHS Secretary Noem explained: “Ending the ‘Shoes-Off’ policy is the latest effort DHS is implementing to modernize and enhance traveler experience across our nation’s airports.”
“We expect this change will drastically decrease passenger wait times at our TSA checkpoints, leading to a more pleasant and efficient passenger experience.”
Noem continued: “This initiative is just one of many the Trump administration is pursuing to usher in the President’s vision for a new Golden Age of American travel.”
When Was The Shoes Off Policy Introduced?
Many people believe that the requirement to remove footwear at the screening checkpoint was introduced in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 in 2001, when a group of terrorists used box cutters and small knives to overpower and kill crew and passengers on four commercial aircraft.
The truth, however, is that while bladed articles were immediately banned from inside airplane cabins, it wasn’t until several years later that the newly created TSA started ordering passengers to remove their shoes and place them in the bin to be screened.
The incident that prompted the additional screening of footwear came about after the attempted bombing of an American Airlines plane on December 22, 2001, by the ‘Shoe Bomber’ Richard Reid, who tried to detonate explosives that he had hidden in his boots.
Thankfully, Reid’s attempted terrorist atrocity failed, and he was quickly restrained by a group of passengers and crew.
Initially, the TSA and airlines asked passengers to voluntarily remove their footwear because they were going through the metal detector arch, but it wasn’t until August 2006 that passengers were mandated to remove their shoes.
That decision followed another terror plot originating in the United Kingdom, where an extremist group devised an ingenious method to smuggle liquid explosives on US-bound flights concealed in drink bottles.
Will Other Countries Follow Suit Now That The DHS Has Ended The ‘Shoes Off’ Policy?
Other countries don’t need to follow suit because the United States had become an outlier in still mandating passengers who had not gone through some sort of vetting process to remove their footwear at the airport security checkpoint.
For example, the United Kingdom relaxed its ‘Shoes Off’ policy around 2010, while the European Union never had a blanket ‘Shoes Off’ policy at all.
Related
Mateusz Maszczynski honed his skills as an international flight attendant at the most prominent airline in the Middle East and has been flying ever since... most recently for a well known European airline. Matt is passionate about the aviation industry and has become an expert in passenger experience and human-centric stories. Always keeping an ear close to the ground, Matt's industry insights, analysis and news coverage is frequently relied upon by some of the biggest names in journalism.
The flight attendants union should probably shut up now.
They have nothing better to do; how else will they waste their members’ dues?
These regulations were put in place for EVERYONES (including yours), safety. I’m Glad the unions didn’t “Shut up” back then, and I’m certainly glad they’re not shutting up now. Maybe you should take some of your advice
Consulting the FA Union about security, next they’re going demand a part in flight deck decisions
Exactly!
Even worse, they weren’t consulted before the airstrike on Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Just terrible. The flight attendants union should definitely be notified when Iran is being bombed! lol!
They’re also annoyed that they weren’t consulted before the U.S. airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Lmao! But seriously, who gives a **** about their opinions? AFA leadership can’t even write a coherent email, let alone offer an informed take on matters of national security.
The FA Union was also against not requiring masks at the end of Covid and would prefer not to serve any food and drinks to passengers at all.
Oh yes – God forbid the petulant mental midgets at AFA and APFA weren’t consulted on matters of national security. How dare the DHS deny Supreme Leader Sara Nelson the opportunity to offer her low-IQ take on something that she has zero qualifications or intellect to comment on!
Unions are never happy.
9-11 wasn’t from shoe bombers, FAs don’t have to take their shoes off at security usually, and they just want to complain about something, anything.
You mean I’ve been living in fear of shoe bombers for nothing? Imagine that. Carry on.
FA’s DID have to take their shoes off. My husband is an airline pilot, and he had to take his shoes off 2 days ago, as he was randomly chosen for an extra security check. He was in his uniform, flying to Paris. He just laughed when he heard about the change. TSA has been ineffective since they first started…
Amazing, my husband is a aeropilot, aussi! He had to remove the shoes 2 days ago, before flying to see me in Paris! He was chosen randomly for the extra security he told me. He was in uniform, and here in France he would be waved through. He too laughed when he heard about the change. I told him he should leave America and become a French pilot. I wonder if they know each other?
Reply
No one cares what the sky waitresses have to say about any matter. Just fetch me another drink and some pretzels, woman, then sit down and STIFLE yourself.
I will have a rum and coke…sky waitresses
The only thing flight attendants do today is hide anyway, they certainly no longer work. So having their unions do nothing but complain about nothing is just par for the course
Who do they think they are? You’re a flying waitress honey. Leave the actual decisions to the grown ups.
The flight attendants should be notified whenever it rains too but aren’t! Truthfully, I doubt that the REAL flight attendants care!
Maybe you should consider staying in your own lane. Serve drinks and food and whine about everything.
The authors “picture” looks like the unabomber
Id care more if the pilots had an issie then if a flight attendent does. At least the pilots actually have some real say on their planes.
Isn’t that the same union that, during Covid, wanted to mandate masks for basically forever?
Why do they think they should have had a vote on this?
The Flying Barrista are having a tantrum.
We should all be thankful the ‘shoe-bomber’ didn’t decide on an anal cavity instead.
The union does not have a say.
Many countries in the world do not make you take off your shoes when going through security.